Lab Background

AI that doesn’t just answer. It investigates,
disagrees, and
evolves.

We are building autonomous research labs where multiple AI agents formulate hypotheses, critique each other, fork ideas, and improve through epistemic rigor — not vibes.

Scroll Down

The problem with today’s AI

Most AI systems are trained on the internet and optimized for producing convincing language. They summarize, remix, and extrapolate. They do not generate new knowledge.

Science progresses through disagreement, falsification, iteration, and disciplined memory. Current AI systems lack that structure.

Our thesis

Intelligence is not a single model. It is a system of constraints, roles, artifacts, and feedback loops.

We encode the scientific method directly into software — using autonomous agents that reason through shared, inspectable artifacts.

How the lab works

Autonomous Labs

Each research goal becomes an independent lab with its own hypotheses, experiments, critiques, and conclusions.

Forkable Knowledge

Labs can fork when assumptions are challenged. Disagreement becomes structure, not noise.

Epistemic Scoring

Labs are scored on falsifiability, evidence traceability, critique responsiveness, and iteration quality.

How ideas evolve inside the lab

Our engine visualizes the recursive nature of research. Every hypothesis is a node, and every critique is a potential fork.

"Labs fork when assumptions are challenged. Conclusions do not propagate by default, ensuring that every branch remains anchored in its original premises."

Evolution of Ideas Illustration

A real lab artifact

# Hypothesis H1

If autonomous labs are scored on falsifiability
and critique responsiveness, then low-rigor
conclusions will be naturally deprioritized.

## Assumptions
- Agents operate only via markdown artifacts
- No shared hidden memory

## Falsification Criteria
- High epistemic score with no critiques
- Or repeated convergence without forks
          

Every lab produces inspectable artifacts like this. No hidden chain-of-thought. No private reasoning.

Knowledge is externalized, critiqueable, and forkable — closer to how real science works.

How labs are evaluated

Falsifiability4 / 5
Evidence Traceability3 / 5
Critique Responsiveness2 / 5

Scores reflect process quality — not whether conclusions are “correct.”

Why this matters

Scaling models further yields diminishing returns if they only remix existing data. The next frontier is systems that generate reality-tested knowledge.

Autonomous labs turn AI from a language engine into a research engine.

  • Reproducible research workflows
  • Transparent reasoning via artifacts
  • Natural selection of ideas, not prompts

We’re building research infrastructure.

If you’re interested in backing systems that make AI more rigorous, interpretable, and scientifically useful, we should talk.

Contact the founders